The retreat of the Commune's National Guard from the gates of the Tuileries was not a tactical withdrawal; it was a complete moral collapse. The soldiers, who had marched on the palace fueled by righteous indignation and the certainty of the King's villainy, trudged back to their sections in a state of bewildered, awestruck confusion. They had come to arrest a poisoner and had been told by the most unimpeachable source imaginable that they had come to interrupt a miracle. The story of the "royal cure," of the Dauphin snatched from the jaws of death by a combination of the King's wisdom and God's grace, spread through the city not like a rumor, but like a shockwave.
Louis knew that this moment of stunned disbelief was a fleeting, precious resource. Public opinion was a ball of wet clay; it could be molded into any shape, but it would harden quickly. His enemies, the Hébertists in the Commune and the shattered remnants of the Jacobins, were in disarray, their narrative blown to pieces. He had a small, critical window of opportunity to seize the narrative completely, to define this event in the public mind before they could regroup and concoct a new set of lies.
He summoned Antoine Barnave to his study. The former radical, now the King's chief political strategist, arrived to find a monarch utterly transformed. The weary, haunted look of the grieving father was gone, replaced by the sharp, predatory focus of a commander on the verge of a decisive victory.
"We have a miracle, Barnave," Louis said, his voice sharp and alive with a new, dangerous purpose. There was no trace of awe or religious sentiment in his tone. He spoke of the miracle as a political scientist would speak of a sudden, favorable shift in the polls. "A miracle is a powerful weapon, but only if it is wielded correctly. Now, we will turn it from a story into a legend. I want every press we control, every friendly journalist, every voice of moderation in this city, to tell the same, single, unified story. We will not just report the news; we will create the truth."
Barnave, a genius of propaganda, a man who understood that revolutions are won with words as much as with bullets, understood immediately. His own exhaustion vanished, replaced by a jolt of pure, professional excitement. For the next forty-eight hours, the two men, the King and his spymaster, orchestrated a press offensive so total, so disciplined, and so effective that it would be studied by future propagandists for a century.
The first and most powerful volley was fired by Barnave's own creation, L'Ami des Lois. The newspaper's front page was a masterpiece of political communication. The headline, in the largest type the press could manage, was a declaration of war and victory: "THE KING SAVES THE DAUPHIN! SCIENCE AND MONARCHY TRIUMPH OVER SUPERSTITION AND TERROR!"
The lead article, written by Barnave himself under his "Cato" pseudonym, was not a dry report, but a soaring, dramatic narrative. It painted a heroic, almost mythical picture of a wise, courageous, scientific King. He was portrayed as a man of the Enlightenment, battling on two fronts: against the ignorant, backward-looking dogmas of the old court physicians, and against the malicious, politically motivated lies of the radical fanatics. He was a father, yes, but he was also a philosopher, a man who had bravely embraced a revolutionary new science to save his son and heir. Dr. Pym was described not as a radical foreigner, but as a humble, brilliant "son of the Enlightenment," a man of pure science discovered by the King's wisdom and brought to France to serve humanity.
The second part of the campaign was to define the villain. With vicious, targeted precision, the articles cast the Paris Commune and the remnants of the Jacobin faction as the story's antagonists. They were portrayed as ghouls, as political vultures who had sought to "dance on the grave of a sick child." The attempt to arrest Dr. Pym was not presented as a political move, but as a barbaric, almost medieval act of ignorance. They were, the paper thundered, a new Inquisition, a superstitious mob trying to burn a great scientist at the stake. The articles expertly framed them as enemies of progress, enemies of science, enemies of the future, and, most damningly, as men who would use a child's death to advance their own sordid political ambitions.
To give this narrative the unimpeachable seal of establishment approval, Louis wielded his most unlikely weapon: Dr. Lassonne. The King summoned the old, converted skeptic and asked him to write a formal, signed attestation of the events. Lassonne, with the powerful, unshakeable zeal of a man whose entire worldview had been shattered and then rebuilt, agreed without hesitation. His statement, published in every moderate paper, was devastatingly effective. He described, in moving, clinical detail, the "hopeless, terminal state" of the Dauphin. He confessed his own skepticism, his own belief that all was lost. And then he described the "medically inexplicable, miraculous" recovery in the hours following the "King's new procedure." He did not try to explain it scientifically; he framed it as an act of Providence, guided by the King's inspired wisdom. Coming from the most respected traditional physician in the kingdom, his testimony was unassailable.
The final element of the campaign was the human one. Louis knew that the story needed a heart. He carefully coached Marie Antoinette for a series of "interviews" with a select group of female journalists who ran popular society papers. The Queen, no longer a political operator but a genuinely grateful and devoted mother, played her part to perfection. She spoke, with tears in her eyes, of her terror, of her prayers, and of her ultimate faith in "the wisdom and courage of my husband, the King," who had never lost hope when she had given in to despair. This powerfully countered the old, poisonous narrative of her as a frivolous, foreign "Austrian." It recast the royal couple as a devoted, loving family who had endured a terrible trial together, a family the entire nation could now embrace and sympathize with.
This relentless, multi-pronged campaign of coordinated narratives completely overwhelmed the radical press. Jacques Hébert, in his foul-mouthed Le Père Duchesne, tried to fight back. He published a furious, rambling edition claiming the whole thing was a hoax, a "damned royalist trick" involving "switched children and bribed doctors." But he had no proof. His accusations, which once had the power to incite riots, now sounded like the desperate, sour grapes of a man who had been completely and utterly outmaneuvered. He was a man screaming blasphemy in the middle of a religious revival.
The effect on the city of Paris was profound. The story of the "King's Miracle" was on everyone's lips. It was discussed in the cafes, in the queues for bread, in the workshops of the artisans. A new, powerful cult of personality was beginning to form around the figure of Louis XVI. He was not the divine-right monarch of his ancestors, a distant, magical figure. He was something far more potent for the dawning age of reason: he was a master of science, a Philosopher King who could command the very forces of nature. He was a king who could seemingly command not just armies, but life and death itself.
The HUD reflected this seismic, almost unbelievable shift in public opinion, a complete reshaping of the political landscape.
PUBLIC OPINION ANALYSIS (PARIS): REAL-TIME
Royal Popularity (Personal Approval): +60% (Highest recorded level since 1789)
Hébertist Faction (Paris Commune) Credibility: -70% (CRITICAL COLLAPSE)
Public Perception of Louis XVI: Philosopher King / Man of Science / Protector of the Family.
New Political Status: Dominant.
Louis had not just survived the crisis. He had taken the most dangerous moment of his life and transformed it into his greatest source of strength. He had not just won the battle; he had rewritten the rules of the entire war.
To be the first to know about future sequels and new projects, google my official author blog: Waystar Novels.