While Talleyrand's agents operated with surgical precision in the elegant drawing rooms and counting houses of London, Antoine Barnave began his own campaign in the far messier, more brutal theater of Parisian public opinion. His mandate from the King was clear: to counter the Jacobins' near-total control of the city's narrative. The radical press, led by the venomous quill of Jean-Paul Marat in L'Ami du peuple and the profane, populist rage of Jacques Hébert in Le Père Duchesne, pumped out a daily diet of suspicion, fear, and calls for blood. They had created a climate of perpetual crisis where moderation was cowardice and accusation was proof of guilt. The few timidly moderate papers that still existed were cowed into silence, afraid to offer any real defense of the King or the Constitution lest they be branded as royalist traitors.
Barnave, using the substantial secret funds provided by Louis, knew that simply trying to bribe existing papers was a fool's errand. He needed a new weapon, a voice that was untainted, sharp, and aimed directly at the heart of the Jacobin machine. He created a new newspaper from scratch. He called it L'Ami des Lois—The Friend of the Laws. Its very name was a rebuke to Marat's populist Friend of the People. The paper's masthead, printed in bold, clear type, declared its loyalty to the three pillars of the constitutional monarchy: "The Nation, The Law, and The King." It was a declaration of war, printed on cheap newsprint and distributed by the thousand.
The paper was a masterpiece of targeted propaganda, far more intelligent than the crude royalist pamphlets that had preceded it. Barnave, having been a Jacobin himself, understood their psychology perfectly. He knew he could not win by defending the old world of priests and nobles. He had to attack the Jacobins on their own terms, using the revolution's own language against them.
When Marat published a furious diatribe calling for the heads of "hoarders and speculators" whom he blamed for the price of bread, L'Ami des Lois responded not with a defense of free markets, but with a sober, detailed article filled with charts and figures (many supplied by Louis's own analysis of the national grain supply). It demonstrated how the King's government had stabilized the food supply after the chaos of the Ancien Régime and how prices were, in fact, lower and more stable than they had been in years. It framed Marat not as a hero of the people, but as a dangerous fantasist whose screeching actively frightened merchants and disrupted the very supply chains that fed the city. It called him, cuttingly, an "enemy of the people's dinner."
When the Jacobin clubs praised the "patriotic virtue" of citizens who denounced their priests, Barnave's paper published a powerful, anonymous letter—penned by Barnave himself—purportedly from a "Patriot of '89," a veteran of the storming of the Bastille. The letter mourned how the noble, heroic act of revolution was being debased into a squalid business of petty neighborhood grudges and false accusations. "Did we tear down the Bastille, where men were imprisoned without trial on the word of a king, only to build a thousand new prisons where men can be condemned without trial on the word of a jealous neighbor?" it asked. The article appealed to the reader's sense of honor and revolutionary pride, turning the Jacobins' own narrative of virtue against them.
Barnave's most brilliant tactic, however, was in how he addressed the disastrous war in the Vendée. He knew he could not hide the defeat, so he reframed it. L'Ami des Lois began running heroic stories of the common soldier. It published letters (some real, some heavily edited or entirely fabricated by Barnave's writers) from National Guardsmen on the front lines. These letters didn't speak of the strategic disaster. They spoke of individual acts of courage: a Parisian tailor holding a barricade against a dozen fanatics, a carpenter dragging his wounded comrade to safety under fire. The paper framed the soldiers as simple patriots, heroes fighting and dying for the unity of France against a savage, foreign-influenced fanaticism.
Subtly, the articles began to hint that these brave men had been betrayed, not by the King, but by incompetent commanders and political generals. This was a breathtakingly cynical move: it co-opted the Jacobins' own attacks on Lafayette, redirecting the anger away from the King's decision and towards the military command. It began to cultivate a powerful new sentiment in Paris: a pro-army, pro-order populism that saw the disciplined soldier, not the radical pamphleteer, as the true hero of the nation.
The Jacobins were enraged. They were not used to being fought with their own weapons. Marat, in his garret, devoted an entire issue of L'Ami du peuple to a furious, paranoid attack on this new rival. He denounced L'Ami des Lois as a "royalist rag," a "mouthpiece for the Austrian Committee," funded with "cartloads of foreign gold." In a chilling escalation, he published the name and home address of the newspaper's official editor—a brave, out-of-work journalist named Clément whom Barnave had hired to be the public face of the operation. Marat ended his article with a sinister call to action: "Good patriots of the Section Théâtre-Français, you know where this traitor lives. Pay him a visit. Ask him who signs his pay-vouchers."
That night, the paper war became a real one. A small mob, inflamed by Marat's words, gathered outside Clément's modest apartment on the Rue des Marais. They threw stones at his windows and chanted for the "traitor editor" to show himself. The scene, narrated from the perspective of the terrified but resolute Clément, was a portrait of the new political reality. He and his wife barricaded their door with their heaviest furniture, listening to the splintering of wood and the howling of the crowd.
But Barnave had anticipated this. He was a general now, and he had to protect his soldiers. A carriage clattered to a halt at the end of the street. A dozen men got out. They were not National Guardsmen in their neat blue uniforms. They were hard-faced men in civilian clothes, former soldiers from the disbanded Royal-Allemand regiment, mercenaries hired for their loyalty to coin rather than ideology. Led by a burly, scar-faced man, they moved with brutal efficiency, wading into the mob with weighted clubs. The fight was short, ugly, and decisive. The mob broke and fled, leaving behind a few groaning figures on the cobblestones. Barnave's men took up positions outside Clément's building, a silent, professional guard.
The message was clear: the King's faction would not be intimidated. They would hit back.
The gambit was working, but the cost was an escalation into open street violence. The circulation of L'Ami des Lois grew rapidly, especially among the shopkeepers, merchants, and property owners of Paris who were terrified of the radicals' power and desperate for a voice of moderation and order. For the first time since the revolution began, the Jacobin narrative had a real, well-funded, and intelligent competitor.
The King's HUD, monitoring the complex currents of Parisian opinion, reflected the shift.
PARISIAN PUBLIC OPINION METRICS: WEEKLY ANALYSIS
Moderate Bourgeoisie Confidence: +15%
Radical Section Influence (Narrative Dominance): -10%
SUCCESS: Operation 'Journal' has successfully established a viable counter-narrative.
WARNING: Risk of targeted political violence against 'King's Men' assets and personnel is now HIGH.
Barnave had won a significant battle in the war of words. But his victory had ensured that the next battle would be fought not just with ink, but with clubs and pistols on the dark streets of Paris. The stakes for Louis's secret faction had just become life and death.
To be the first to know about future sequels and new projects, follow my official author blog: https://waystarnovels.blogspot.com/