The Law of Suspect Priests, signed in the desperate quiet of a Parisian night, was a scream heard across Europe. In the courts of Vienna and Berlin, it was taken as proof of the French Revolution's inherent madness. But nowhere did the scream echo louder than in London. The news of the law, followed swiftly by exaggerated reports of the military disaster in the Vendée and the first mass deportations from Norman ports, sent a shockwave of triumphant horror through British society.
The London press, already hostile, became hysterical. Gifted émigrés, welcomed into the salons of the aristocracy, painted vivid, heartbreaking pictures of a France descending into a godless anarchy, a nation of savages murdering their priests and their king a helpless captive. The great conservative orator, Edmund Burke, who had long prophesied that the revolution would end in blood and terror, now seemed like a prophet vindicated. His words were quoted in every paper and repeated in every club on St. James's Street.
More dangerously, the British government, under the cool, calculating leadership of Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger, began to see an opportunity. France, consumed by internal chaos, its army humiliated by a peasant rabble, seemed weak, vulnerable. It was a perfect moment to reverse the stinging humiliation of the American War, to reassert British dominance, and to crush their revolutionary rival before its contagion could spread. The rhetoric in Parliament grew hawkish. The Royal Navy, the most powerful instrument of war on the planet, began mobilizing for what were publicly termed "defensive maneuvers" in the Channel. It was the classic prelude to war.
The official French ambassador in London, the well-meaning but hopelessly outmaneuvered Marquis de Chauvelin, sent a stream of panicked dispatches to Paris. He was being stonewalled by the British Foreign Office. His meetings were cancelled; his letters went unanswered. War, he wrote, seemed not just possible, but imminent.
Louis reviewed these reports with his official council of ministers. The men, frightened and rudderless since Necker's departure, proposed the standard, useless diplomatic tools: formal notes of protest, appeals to international law, offers of renewed assurances of peace. They were proposing to send a sternly worded letter to a man who was sharpening his sword. Louis listened patiently, his face an impassive mask, and then dismissed them. Their world of formal diplomacy was dead.
That night, he met with Talleyrand in the small, secret library. The candlelight glinted off the former bishop's intelligent, cynical eyes.
"They are preparing for war," Louis stated simply, pushing Chauvelin's latest panicked dispatch across the table. There was no fear in his voice, only a cold assessment of fact. "But Pitt is not a sentimentalist. He is a man of finance, a man of the budget, much like Necker was. He will not commit to a war, a ruinously expensive war, if his own merchant class—the men who fund his government and whose fortunes depend on trade—are staunchly against it. We will not appeal to his honor or his love of peace. We will attack his balance sheet."
This was the first true mission for his new Minister of Secrets. Louis had already arranged for the transfer of a substantial sum—one hundred thousand livres—from his own personal fortune, the private wealth of the Duke of Orléans which he had seized, into a discreet account in a Genevan bank, an account to which Talleyrand now had exclusive access.
Talleyrand read the dispatch, a faint, appreciative smile playing on his lips. "A direct appeal is useless, Your Majesty. Protesting our good intentions will only confirm their belief that we are weak. We must make the war seem not unjust, but merely… unprofitable. A poor investment." He did not go to London himself; that would be too obvious, a sign of panic. Instead, over the next forty-eight hours, he set his own quiet, intricate plan in motion, dispatching a network of agents who were not diplomats, but surgeons of influence.
His first agent was a man named Étienne Clavière, a Swiss banker from Geneva with whom Talleyrand had long-standing financial ties. Clavière was a man who understood that politics was merely the surface foam on the deep currents of money. He traveled to London, not as an envoy of the French state, but as a concerned representative of Genevan financial interests. He secured private meetings in the wood-paneled backrooms of the City of London, with the powerful financiers and directors of the East India Company whose investments propped up Pitt's government.
He did not speak of politics or the rights of man. He spoke their language. He quietly, regretfully, warned them that a declaration of war would have a catastrophic effect on the value of British-held French bonds. The new French government, he hinted, would have no choice but to immediately default on the massive pre-revolutionary loans held by British banks. It would be a disaster for their portfolios. He then subtly spread rumors, backed by plausible but unprovable figures, of France's surprising financial resilience, hinting that the Assignat was stabilizing and that any war would be long, draining, and ruinously expensive for the British treasury. He planted a single, powerful seed of doubt: what if France wasn't the basket case the newspapers claimed it was?
The second agent was a playwright and wit, a friend of Talleyrand's from the salons of Paris, a man named de Montrond. He traveled to London and, using Talleyrand's funds, began to produce a series of anonymous, brilliantly written pamphlets. These pamphlets did not defend the French Revolution. They were far too clever for that. They argued from a purely British perspective of cynical self-interest. "Why should a good British soldier die in a foreign ditch to save a French priest?" one asked. "Why must the tax on tea and beer be raised to restore an absolute King to his throne across the Channel? Is not a stable, constitutional France, hungry for British goods, a better neighbor than a chaotic, bankrupt one ruled by émigré fanatics who will immediately return to their old rivalries?" These pamphlets were distributed for free in the London coffee houses where merchants, ship-owners, and Members of Parliament gathered to read the day's news. They didn't preach ideology; they whispered the language of the counting house into the ear of the nation of shopkeepers.
The final move was the most brilliant, a classic Talleyrand feint. He used a third party, a Dutch journalist known for his opposition to Pitt, to leak a document to Charles James Fox, the eloquent and powerful leader of the Whig opposition. The document was a carefully edited version of Necker's final financial report to Louis—the real numbers, but stripped of Necker's pessimistic conclusions. The leak was deniable, but the data was solid.
In the House of Commons, during a heated debate on naval appropriations, Fox rose to his feet. Armed with Talleyrand's data, he publicly and powerfully questioned the wisdom of funding a massive military expansion to fight a supposedly bankrupt nation. He ridiculed the government's intelligence, painting a picture of a France that, while turbulent, was far from the weak and collapsing state that the war hawks claimed. He argued that Pitt was leading Great Britain towards a costly quagmire based on the hysterical fantasies of French aristocrats.
The speech was a political sensation. It gave voice to the private anxieties that Talleyrand's agents had so carefully cultivated among the monied classes. The pressure on Pitt's government became immense.
A week after Talleyrand's agents had begun their work, a coded message arrived for Louis at the Tuileries. It was not a formal dispatch, but a short note from his Minister of Secrets. It contained a brief, translated transcript from the previous day's session in the British Parliament. Pitt's request for war funding had been defeated. The Prime Minister, seeing his support evaporate, had been forced to give a speech affirming Great Britain's commitment to neutrality, so long as the chaos in France did not spill over its borders. The naval mobilization was to be officially canceled.
In a single, silent campaign of whispers, finance, and targeted information, Louis and Talleyrand had completely neutralized a threat that could have destroyed the revolution. They had won a major victory without firing a shot, proving the stunning value of their new, amoral approach to statecraft.
The HUD flashed, confirming the success with its usual dispassionate analysis.
GEOPOLITICAL THREAT ANALYSIS: GREAT BRITAIN
Military Stance: De-escalated
Political Stance: Neutrality Reaffirmed
Probability of Intervention (Next 6 Months): 5% (LOW)
SUCCESS: Covert operation 'Whisper' has achieved all primary objectives.
Louis allowed himself a small, grim smile. He had won his first secret victory. But as he looked out his window at the darkening Paris sky, he knew this triumph abroad was immediately and starkly contrasted by the escalating chaos at home.
To be the first to know about future sequels and new projects, follow my official author blog: https://waystarnovels.blogspot.com/