How? Isn't he the Knower of the unseen? The young researcher laughed and all his colleagues who came with him laughed their mouths out loud. Then the young researcher began his talk while gesturing to Aref to sit down. Aref sat down, wary of them, as he looked at them one after the other with looks full of confusion and anxiety. The young researcher sat in front of him, facing him as if he was confronting him or wanted to put him in a debate and confrontation while he said to him in a tone of voice full of a mixture of regret, challenge and mockery: My companions and I were like you one day. We believed that he knows the unseen, as we and you all believed in all the past decades and long years in which he established his false divinity and his tyrannical kingdom and rule. This was of course after the false preachers and those like them who had interests helped him.
We thought that he was the true God whose existence we believed in and that he is capable of everything and knows everything until we knew the whole truth and were shocked by it at first, but soon the sacred aura disappeared. The fake and the light of reason and logical thinking removed its veil and the darkness of its pitch blackness from above our eyes. It soon became clear to us that we were the delusional ones and we saw it as pitch darkness, a radiant light, and falsehood as correct and sound, and a logical truth in that it is the biggest lie and the ugliest deception.
Aref, swallowing his saliva: What do you mean by deception and lie? Please clarify your intentions so that I can understand you? Otherwise, I will end the conversation between us immediately before it begins and leave the library.
The researcher: Your god Antar says or claims not in his capacity as a tyrannical ruler as we knew him before, of course, but in his capacity that has been established in all of our minds and on which we grew up and grew up, that he is the one and only god who was the first cause of everything around us and in our existence, or as he claims, he created us and other creatures on our planet (Antaruto), and that he is also the one who punishes and rewards, and he is the one who guides and misleads as he wishes, and by his divine will everything is done, isn't that so?
Aref answers hesitantly: Yes, of course, this is what we grew up on and what we found our fathers and most of our families doing. The researcher approaches Aref while facing him face to face and with confidence: Then why does he claim punishment and reward and what is he blamed for and rewarded for? If he is the one who caused everything and he is the one who knows as you all think? He said it with a sarcastic smile (He knows the unseen in advance before it happens). Can you punish a person for something you planned for him and wanted him to do and wanted it intentionally and knew about it in advance, whatever this thing is, by what right do you punish him?
And who is the one who caused what this person did in this case? And who really deserves punishment, him or you? Aref, with some distress and tension: Of course I will be the real culprit and I will not accept doing this despicable act to anyone.. But. The researcher added and interrupted him with a confident sharpness that threw the letters of his words like the edge of a sword from between his lips: Your God did it. Before Aref could take the initiative or think about responding, the researcher surprised him with his words that came out like a cold dagger to cut off all the letters that he could respond to him with before they existed, saying: Why does your god Antar Al-Antari resort to the method of intimidation and enticement?
It is a type of terrorism. It is also evidence of his lack of confidence in himself and his divine power and conclusive evidence of his extreme fear, yes his extreme fear. Otherwise, if his divinity is real and he trusts in his religion and his holy book and his power and greatness and that his religion and belief which he imposes on you day and night and with every breath and every blink of an eye and he claims that it exists in your nature and innate disposition, then why does he resort to the method of punishment and threats sometimes as if he fears that you will discover him or leave him or refuse his servitude and deny his divinity one day?
And why does he also resort to the method of enticement by promising you his heavens and his indescribable food and his bliss that has never crossed the mind of a human being and you have not seen it and will not see it even after your death? Haven't you asked yourself why He doesn't do that and show us the wonders of His eternal bliss to the believing servants who draw near to Him and pray to Him day and night, bowing and prostrating in His name. Why stop them now while they are alive? Why not now? Why does He postpone His reward and recompense and always warn you of His woe and torment? Why? This is evidence that He is a deceitful liar who is not confident in himself and in the security of his actions. This is more debatable than that He is nothing and that His divinity is nothing but an illusion and a myth. If He were honest, He would not have resorted to frightening you once and tempting you another time. This is the method of lying swindlers.
. He and his followers and preachers are not a gang, but a dangerous gang that exploits you in the worst way and deludes you with the false idea of faith that has no reason or logic and makes you covet and desire bliss and fear eternal torment, just like the principle of the carrot and the stick. The principle of nonsense and the master. It is clear humiliation embodied in the person of a tyrannical ruler who claims divinity because he is afraid of loneliness. He feels it around him everywhere. Aref, stunned, with his mouth open and signs of sadness mixed with anger appearing on his face: / Loneliness.. What loneliness.
Researcher: Yes, what he says and does indicates a terrible fear of the future. He claimed to disappear and that he will not appear from the day he became the one and only God, as he deluded you, except because he fears that his matter and the matter of his divinity will be revealed, or because this God is an illusion and does not exist. Therefore, he claimed, through the tongues of his preachers, that he fears for you from his exalted divine self that you will not be able to bear seeing him. Didn't he tell you that? Aref: Of course, he is a god, and it is not permissible for a god to appear to us, since his divine being and self are different from our nature, and because he knows that, he is hiding it from us.
The researcher laughed and his companions joined him in several ecstasies that filled the library, as if they were earthquakes, and the library shelves were about to fall with all the heroic books they carried, falling to the ground, announcing their defeat in front of the clatter of laughter and the strength of its roar.
Then the researcher added, saying: Haven't you realized yet, despite your love for knowledge, science, and reading, that he was lying in all his claims, as were his preachers and angels who are his guardians. Haven't you understood that this god that he attributes to himself is nothing but (for nothing…then for nothing), and therefore he claims this illusion that he has a different nature…
My dear Aref, these are words that carry much more patchwork and deception than they carry truth, logic, and the reality in which we live. Aref tried after hearing him to gather his strength and control himself, gathering the wound and crack that had recently begun to bleed in the body of the great faith.
The researcher answered while trying to bandage these wounds and ease the pain of this crack as if he were a sacrifice facing death while in his last throes, trying and hoping to keep the rest of his life or some faith, saying: The god Antar, as we understood from his holy book and his tolerant law, and as we have always known him, is wise in everything he says and does, and it is in his hand if he wanted to make us all equal in believing in him and all equal in competing to obey him and gain his pleasure and avoid his wrath and punishment, but he made humans different and made us on this planet (Antaruto) different in faith and belief in him and in the degrees of closeness to him and fear of his punishment because if he made us equal, there would be no justification for punishment or torment and reward and bliss, and he gave us the freedom guaranteed to us in believing in him and competing to obey and worship him after he established for us the clear pillars and evidence on His power as a god which proves his divinity and the necessity of obeying and loving him and most importantly fearing him especially since the god (Antar) has ordered us to contemplate the universe which is our planet we live on (the planet Antaruto) and put all the evidence and wonders of his power in this amazing planet and after that the punishment will be for our choices we the believing slaves so whoever is stubborn after all that and does not approach him or rejects his divinity like you and your companions then he deserves punishment. Isn't this freedom of choice?
He guides whomever he wants to guidance and searches for it and contemplates the ways and path of God, but in return he leads astray whoever freely chooses misguidance and refuses to approach God and believe in him and contemplate his power and know his divinity and obey him and fear him, so he deserves punishment for his choice.
The enlightenment researcher smiled a confident smile and signs of good news and relief appeared on him as he realized intuitively that Aref wants to understand and know the truth or at least the broad outlines of it and since there is no absolute truth. At least, the person who wants to be aware and comprehend what is going on around him must ask and clarify, not turn into a vessel that exudes everything he has received and stuffed his mind with without awareness or even questioning, so he turns into a remote control or a programmed machine that contains and transmits everything he has been programmed with since childhood without having the right to ask.
Then the enlightenment researcher added, saying: Everything you say, my dear, is only confirmed evidence of the ferocity of the Most Important One or the one you think is the One and Only God, and evidence of his savagery and injustice, although he claims the opposite and tells you through his followers and preachers that he is merciful, compassionate, generous and compassionate towards his believing servants, of course, but this or that is nothing but false claims and blatant lies because he simply uses his holy book, which is filled with all the unjust rulings and laws that have no mercy, and he exploits his Antorabi law, which he claims is a tolerant law that he exploits for his benefit always.
If you read your holy book carefully and remove the foggy aura that clouds your eyes, And if your awareness and understanding were to mask its blind sanctification, you would find that most of these sacred rulings and sermons are nothing but terrorist words full of racism, hostility, and threats of punishment, woe, and torment for anyone who opposes and violates the foolish, arrogant Sharia, I mean the tolerant Sharia, or the one you claim to be so.
Then you see him resorting to the cheap method of enticement and suspense with ideas that are, to say the least, degenerate and the cheapest and meanest means to control a person or a group. Otherwise, why would the most important and arrogant resort to making you absent with the eternal leader in his kingdom and his vast compassion and drinking and enjoying all the good things that he currently prevents you from in this worldly life, such as women and pregnancy, under the pretext that this distracts you from him and from getting close to him, and then you see him suddenly making you happy with what he forbade you from and more, but after the end of time and after you perish? Haven't you wondered why after your death?
Why not now, for example? The rivers cannot do that, or let's say he is a narcissistic god who loves himself and has a delusion of grandeur or a lack of deprivation from something, so he imposed on you abstaining from all pleasures or what he sees as such, and most likely they are not so. Why then would he stop you immediately if you proved your loyalty to him? This ether is in your soul or in the soul of any believing slave subject to its restrictions.
This ether is any doubts or questions you have, O group of believing, trustworthy and monotheistic believers. Then why does sarcasm postpone its cases and postpone the ruling in them and the accountability of the guilty until after death and annihilation? Then he tells you that there is a day that he has designated and called the Day of Reckoning. In return for that day, let the corrupt and unjust graze as they please, for he has no authority over them. Let whatever happens to the believing slaves happen until the promised meeting on this other day, or the one that he claims has been delayed or brought. Suppose you saw a judge from the judges do that in cases or postpone the ruling in them for an indefinite period and claim that this inevitable term is inevitable, but when? Only God knows and how? Also, there is no answer. They are all options and skills that science has proven false and proven true from the beginning. What do you think of such a judge or such a court or trial?
Show me that it is fair for him to do that? Aref added, his words faltering on his lips as he cleared his throat with the staggering of a slaughtered man whose blood had flowed, saying: Of course not, it is not fair for a judge to do this. He would be an unjust judge who lets evil spread corruption on earth as it pleases. Before Aref could finish his talk, the researcher completed the discussion and the wall he had started, as if he had expected that Aref would defend his god and would inevitably try to find justifications for his divine actions. He continued his talk like a warrior about to plunge his sword into his opponent's neck, saying: The most important thing, my dear, is that instincts are always resorted to because they are the cheapest means followed by those with little cunning or no conscience in situations and humiliation, or like someone who knows that his goods are of poor quality and fears scandal, so you see him resorting to human instinct, using it as a weapon that is fast-acting and effective, to distract the mind and consciousness from sound perception and thinking, which are his worst enemies. If this is not phobia itself, then when can we call it terrorism?
Terrorism is simply an organized and programmed method of subjugation and intimidation through an idea to subjugate a group or a person, such as servile slaves or believers, or let's say the gifted, to subject them to a certain thought or trend or adopt a certain belief or submit to a person or a controlling ruling force. It is exactly brainwashing to distance them from understanding, perception, and logical or scientific thinking to reveal the hidden and concealed facts. This is usually for political, religious, or social goals. Or all of them together. Then he continued his speech as he approached Aref with his body, saying confidently: Isn't that what the god Antar al-Antari does to you, you believing slaves? Then what kind of law is this that accustoms you to the principle of interests (take and give), hand me over and I will hand you over.
Meaning that everything has a price and that there is nothing without a price or benefit in return for this thing. What kind of morals are these that are not practiced except in return for a reward or recompense and fear of punishment or seeking forgiveness for a sin or transgression or crime? They are paid morals. What a wonderful morals!!!! And what a contemptible principle!!! And what a foolish blind faith that does not see, hear, or think and has no mind or logic to enlighten it about the truths of things and their inner meanings!!!!
After the researcher fixed his eyes on Aref's gaze, and with confidence and the usual bold tone in his loud voice, he looked at him with his strong eyes, saying: Tell me, brother Aref, which is more noble and more fortunate in clumsiness, sophistication, and a humane outlook on things? To do good and behave ethically and with principles with others without compensation, and while you know full well that there is no compensation of any kind, non-material, nor place or position that you will obtain except for doing good, doing good, and helping the needy only, for nothing else. Or do you do the same thing but for a compensation, and you are fully confident that you are doing it, as you say, for the sake of the proud god, and to gain his pleasure, and to seek his forgiveness, pardon, and pardon for your sins and shortcomings in his face, and to seek reward and eternal blessings.
Then you say that this matter and others are only done by the faithful servant so that he will have a place in our account or in the scale of his rewards and recompense. What materialistic logic do you judge, and by what materialistic method does the scent of interests and the principle of benefit that you think with? This is faith. Faith for a reward and a reward of interest, not… Just for humanity or doing good for the sake of good itself, or even waiting for a reward and fearing violence or punishment??
Oh, what a style that only suits humiliated slaves, or excuse me, as you say, slaves, but they are free in their choices and they are the ones who choose the path of torment or the path of bliss with their own hands. Oh, what a foolish, humiliating slavery. You weigh your blind potential by the kilo on the scale of good deeds as if it were a trade (a trade of morals for trade!! And let us see which side will outweigh the other (good deeds, how many kilos, and bad deeds also by the kilo, which one will overwhelm the other, and it is all on the scale, Pasha (Ala Onah ala Do, don't you see?)
It is the divine auction of faith in which only believers who possess divine, heroic, and faithful principles participate, and who apply them with merit. A strange principle of low status and value that diminishes the status of its owner and places him in the rank of the lowly and abject, so that he actually becomes a slave and a believer.
He will not carry these two qualities with merit unless he applies this principle… Aref glanced at him with looks filled with suppressed anger that was not without confusion, and with wandering looks, his eyes began to roam and wander in all parts of the library like someone searching for a needle in a haystack or trying to catch a fly flying all over the place, and his attempts go in vain, but he replied Trying to gather his strength and control his nerves and with fake calmness he answered him saying: I see that you are exaggerating in your description a lot and are more interested in attacking than the fair and just Raddoud.
Enlightenment researcher: How? Can you tell me how I neglected justice and fairness and how I was wrong in my speech.
Aref: Any objection and rejection of any thought, religion, belief, or any other aspect of life must have a reference and based on that reference a person evaluates anything in front of him or any idea or thought and through this reference and its laws he can and is able to judge something or a belief whether it is correct or wrong. Researcher: That's true.. but until now I have not seen that I have violated that, as all the actions of your god and his belief are full of violence and incitement to racism and hatred of those who violate that blind belief and strongly encourage you to fear, cowardice and humiliation in the hope of reward and fear of punishment. Isn't all of this contrary to humanity?
It is an inhuman belief. Aref added with confidence that was swinging between despair and hope, saying: Here is the crux of the matter. So your reference in judging the belief of believers and the existence of the god Antar or not is the reference of humanity, isn't it?
Enlightenment Researcher: Yes, indeed it is.
Aref: Does this humanity have a constitution or written law or a known place that guides people to right and wrong and sets standards for them to teach them and teach them the specifications of humanity and the conditions for a person and actions to be humane or not?
Researcher: I mentioned this matter to you during my talk, and indeed humanity has written many references and researches and it has known constitutions and laws that only a liar or an ignorant person would deny. A voracious reader like you should have read about humanity and known it better than anyone else. In addition, humanity is what you feel from within and what runs deep within you of a feeling of nobility, goodness and moral advancement through merciful actions, not only towards humans, but towards all living beings. This is something that everyone agrees on and they unanimously agree that it is humane, merciful, compassionate and helping everyone in need. Aref: And that this place does exist, but it is a bad place and there are evil people in it and they decided that killing and bloodshed are mercy for the sick who are incurable or they feel that killing is merciful and better for many people and they decided to do that unanimously among all of them and they feel that killing is humane in many cases.
Then he continued his talk sarcastically, saying mockingly: And should I talk to you at that time and ask you how you would feel now if anything happened in life or the planet we live on, so that your feeling would be the center of the universe? If you were satisfied, then the matter is psychological, and if you do not sympathize and are not satisfied with it, then it is inhumane. Do you think it is fair to evaluate right and wrong in this way, and thus a gelatinous, sticky, and elastic reference that does not settle on anything, just like the feeling that everyone sees according to his whims and according to what he desires or wishes. And if you spoke to me about reason, logic, and humanity combined, and you told me, as you mentioned in your debate with me, that reason is like the center of the universe, and that every human being has a mind, thought, and awareness with which he perceives the correct matter, and his mind and thought guide him to what is correct in accordance with his mind, and with which he knows the truths and the inner workings of things, as you mentioned.
With each other I will direct you with the same argument if we may express it and call it that and I will say to you the same thing, let us suppose that for example I suddenly pull a sharp tool from my pocket and my mind and thinking guide me to kill you and I see that this action is rational and logical from my point of view and that this result that I was guided to through my mind is logical and wise to me, so what do you think at that time? Of course you will be confused and will not be able to determine a clear answer about the true meaning of humanity and its fixed principles nor about how to rely on the mind and thinking in determining right from wrong, and I see in that the most extreme degree of manipulation and fraud, so when you do that you have committed a great fallacy, so by doing this you are changing the roles. I want to understand from you what is the reference for right and wrong and you want to convince me that the consensus on something that is humane and rational at the same time is correct. Do you see in that justice or fairness in judging any matter and especially in judging a belief, a god and a religion.
The researcher sighed a long sigh and let out a hot sigh that scorched Aref's face like a storm of fire in the scorching sun of a day. He smiled sarcastically with bitterness mixed with despair that was not without a drop of hope that appeared on his lips as he said: I see that you answered me what I did not answer and what I did not utter. You put words on my tongue that I did not say. You made me say what I did not utter and distorted my words from their places. You made an opponent for yourself out of nothing and dressed him in clothes of your own making to tear them up, claiming that they were worn out and corroded, so that victory would be your ally. Aref swallowed his dry saliva like a drop of water trying to run between the cracks of a river that dried up centuries ago, only to find it returning in vain. He said hesitantly: How is that? And did I do that without knowing?
Aren't you the one who told me about humanity and inhumanity in my faith and belief and my god Antar and about terrorism and the necessity of using reason and logic. Researcher: This is exactly what you do, O believers. You take the parts of the conversation and turn to clinging to specific words to create an imaginary opponent from your imagination. You dress him up in the cloak of pretending to be credible, clear, frank and rational, to weave a hero of your own making and a battle of your own imagination and an opponent you tailor to your mood and according to your imagination and whims. This is precisely the fallacy of the (straw man) or (acrobatic fallacy). You speak as if you were an acrobat in a circus, playing with words and taking meanings out of their phases and interpretations and dressing them up as you want to show the weakness of the argument of your opponent whom you created from your imagination? Aref is surprised and asks: (Straw man?? What is that? I do not understand you. Please explain your intentions?
The researcher: I will explain to you, although you understand and realize deep down what I am aiming at and how far the talk has taken you away from my intentions and what I am aiming at. The straw man, my dear, is a title given to a deceitful person with weak evidence or even arguments, and he came to him from a poor person who does not find anything to satisfy the hunger of his mind and thinking that has become rusty thanks to blind faith, so you see him resorting immediately, with the weakness of his arguments or evidence, to this straw man whose sin you are surprised to hear, or the clown whose role you played and thought that you did it brilliantly. While you did not add anything to what your arrogant god did before and what his followers, the preachers, and all those who believed him and believed in his deception did, whether out of naivety, weakness, lack of resourcefulness, or out of hypocrisy and mutual interests.
This straw man is a name that has an origin in popular heritage, I thought that We are referring to the men who would wake up at the door of any dispute or trial decided by a judge in a court, or any dispute between two people, and they would write down and put straw in their shoes and fill them with straw. This was an indication from them that they were ready to be false witnesses and lie in any quarrel or dispute between two people, and of course in exchange for a fee or to achieve certain agreed-upon interests.
The meaning of my words is that the acrobatic fallacy that you performed with the skill of a clown means that you did or pretended that you refuted or were able to refute my argument and evidence that I spoke about. In my dialogue with you, you refuted a statement or evidence that I did not present, or more precisely, I did not speak about it in the way you wanted to convey to me and in a way that I did not intend at all in my conversation with you. In reality, you fought a straw man that you made from your imagination and made him say what you wanted, not what he said.
In reality, you attacked the straw man that they make like a doll and dress him in clothes and a straw hat to intimidate and make others believe that he is a real person. I see that your style was charged with emotion and its goal was to defeat me artificially or pretend that you defeated me, but you did not care at all to reach rational, logical thinking and you did not care in any way to reach a rapprochement between our points of view or to find points of convergence in the dialogue. Aref: Quite the opposite, I am trying to understand your intentions. In fact, I hope that you will enlighten me with the light of your mind or thought that I sense in your words. I want to understand and comprehend what you are aiming at in your speech and I am trying to search for rationality and logic in it and to link that to science, but until now I have not fully comprehended or have not reached complete understanding or rather complete conviction in what you are trying to convince me of.
The Enlightenment Researcher: He smiled sarcastically, mixed with bitterness and a smile, and that is why you made a straw man from your imagination to delude yourself that you are right in your beliefs and that I said such and such, but you even lied about me in things I did not say in the first place, and you started fighting the imaginary straw man with a fake weapon that you invented yourself to believe your delusions and live with your false belief in an imaginary god invented by a false religion like all the religions and messengers that were sent to you through your false god (Antara) who deluded you that he is present in books that are said to be sacred and that he sent you messengers to tell you about him and his virtue and greatness and guide you to believe in him. Aref added, interrupting him with annoyance mixed with a tone of hesitant and confused voice, saying: How do you realize that he is a false and imaginary god? And where did you get this confidence from? Did it not occur to you that you might be wrong and that you might be the one who is delusional and not me? Then why do you accuse faith of being merely surrender without evidence and merely a feeling of something or a false ability and surrendering to its existence without certainty? Prove to me that your words are logical and not merely nonsense and an attack on true sanctities that have a profound impact on our lives. Without it, we wouldn't have been…
The researcher interrupted him, saying confidently and with a gentle smile on his lips: Take it easy, Aref. If you want evidence of the truth of what I say, then I will present to you a list of evidence to prove to you that you have committed and practiced with me the straw man fallacy. The first evidence of that is that at the beginning of our dialogue, I did not say that humanity, which your God, religion and sanctities have been stripped of, I did not say that it has no reference, and my words did not indicate this at all, and I did not say that humanity is merely my feeling that this or that thing is human or not. Rather, humanity is a system in itself and has constitutions that have been printed and written in them, with rights for the human being that guarantee his dignity and freedom to express his opinion and guarantee him to adopt what he believes and consider that attacking him simply for adopting an idea is a type of terrorism. There are many constitutions that have been written in this regard and have been talked about by many who demand freedom of belief, justice and equality among humans, respect for all creatures and observing their rights, even animals and plants. But of course you got rid of them in this library and destroyed them, so that they would not be among the shelves of these piled-up, not sacred books. He said that while pointing his index finger in a mocking and sarcastic manner. He added, confidently, completing his speech, and before you ask me how I knew that, I will tell you that I obtained copies of them through my communication with their owners who had the credit for changing my thinking and enlightening my path. Then he approached Aref with a look of kindness and sympathy and said to him: My dear, my friends and I were like you one day. He said that while looking at his friends who were sitting close to them listening to what was happening and the discussion and debate taking place between them.
Aref impatiently: You still haven't proven to me where the logical fallacy is? And you haven't proven to me that faith is just an illusion and a myth and that God is a fake and does not exist. If that is the case, then where is the real God? What is your evidence that He is a false God or does not exist? The researcher: As long as you are searching for the truth, then listen, you stubborn, naive believer. Here is the truth that will clarify to you what was hidden from you and what you wanted to know and realize its hidden contents. Aref eagerly mixed with a disappointed, confused, hesitant tone: Come on, tell me what you have,
Researcher: Let's start from the beginning (the alleged creation story that preachers have always been beating our heads with and that Antar and his envoys, who they claim are his messengers, taught them. In the beginning, the story began with the god Antar, after he transformed from an unjust, tyrannical ruler and suddenly decided that he had become a god, claiming that he had been like that since eternity and that he had existed in eternity, with no beginning or end because of the laws of nature, and that he had been hiding that characteristic from himself in order to gradually reveal it to us in order to make it easier for us to comprehend that matter.
Despite the failure of this naive claim, you see in it a wide hole that you Muslims cannot patch or repair the rift in, since these characteristics that this god or ruler attributes to himself and his claim that he has existed since eternity and has no beginning or end and that he is eternal and above the laws of physical nature, don't you see with me that these same characteristics apply to the emerging one, meaning that this negates the characteristic of him being a god or his existence as a god in the first place? This refugee god does not exist, and the evidence is that the emerging one also has no beginning or end because he is a void of nothingness, and only the thing with defined features is what we can know its beginning or end.
Also, the refugee is a name outside the laws of nature, and we cannot subject him to them for a simple reason, that he is something that does not exist in the first place. So how can we subject him to the laws if he is outside them because he does not exist in the first place? Also, if we assume that these qualities exist in a being with supernatural powers and can hide or is omnipotent to the point that he has the ability to go beyond the boundaries of nature, this makes the matter more complicated, as this opens the door to any claim from any person. Any being can claim that he believes in a being with supernatural powers and say that he is a hidden being (like the flying spaghetti monster, for example, or the pink dragon, or any hidden ghost that no one has and will not see), under the pretext that he cannot appear to humans because they will not tolerate that by nature.
However, he claims that he is the one who created them with this nature and created them with this formation, and despite this, he does not have the ability to program them and make them adapt to seeing him if he appeared to them and made them feel his presence, so he chose to hide and not appear based on that flimsy argument. So where is the logic in this?
And by what right do you demand that I or your alleged god demand that humans believe that he became a god and that he was eternal from the beginning before anything existed and that he is all-knowing and all-powerful? Where is this power if he cannot appear and is not able to control humans whom he claims to have created and yet they will not be able to bear to see him because their nature is different from his. What logic is in this??? What logic I am amazed at!!!!
Then what right do you or any other deceitful and fraudulent preachers demand from me to believe and submit to his orders and acknowledge his alleged divinity and oneness and on what basis as long as I have not seen from him any evidence or proof that he is a truly existing god even indirectly? Your god has not proven his existence to me in any way since the moment he disappeared and announced that he was no longer a ruler and that he was originally a god as he claimed. And I will tell you more, when he invented the story that he is the first creator and originator or the first cause of our creation despite my reservations about this idea of creation from nothing because it is against science, everything in the universe is manufactured from tools or things and components that existed beforehand and the universe scientifically and our planet, the planet of Antaruto which he named after himself and attributed this wretched planet to him, is nothing but a series of interconnected and competing existences and beings. So if we accept his claim that he is the first cause and the primary mover and motivator of everything on our planet, then why did he need to make an enemy for himself?
Imaginary, just because of a disagreement that occurred between them, so he exploited this disagreement to make himself a hero, but in reality he is a paper hero and a hero fighting a person who created his existence and created the idea of his disobedience, although he is the one who planned and plotted with his followers for everything that happened intentionally and deliberately since the day he invented for us and appeared to us with his new entity, claiming that he is the god (Antar), the creator of the planet (Antaruto) and its creator and our creator and the creator of us and all beings, and all of that is only to find a justification to make himself a god and appoint himself as the one controlling the destinies of the universe, humans and beings and creating them, as if he was not satisfied with being an unjust, tyrannical ruler who is not distinguished by anything more than recklessness, stupidity, tyranny, greed and avarice. Aref: Who do you mean by the fabricated enemy if you mean …..
But the researcher interrupted him and said with interest: Let me please finish my talk and confiscate my words so that you do not commit a new logical fallacy and confiscate what is required as is the habit of believers and always remember that your alleged god Antar did not find a way or method or way to reach him except through faith.. meaning submission and obedience to the idea that he is a god and he has to hide for that. As if he is playing a game of concealment with us to test us and see who will believe in his existence like this without evidence.. Didn't you ask yourself why he chose faith as the only way and no other to reach him? Doesn't that mean that there is a secret in the matter for Ayoubi, that he knows full well that he cannot prove his alleged divinity in a definitive and certain way, neither he nor his followers, and they have no evidence or proof to prove that, so they resorted to the trick of blind, unseen faith, there is no other way and it is the ideal means of deception through it..
And if you want to respond to my talk, I will guarantee you the freedom to respond to me after I finish my talk. But let me finish what I started and you have to be convinced first. At first, I mean by enemy, as you know, (Saman) who worked for him in his great palace and collected taxes and duties for him and managed all the affairs of his palace and his followers, but when he ordered him to kneel and prostrate before the first human being he created according to the alleged story, and he refused and was arrogant, he became angry with him and imprisoned him for a long time until hatred was born between them. Although this story is fabricated because the differences between them began to creep in when Saman coveted increasing his money and what he received in the palace, the greed and avarice of this tyrannical ruler prevented him from making him steal people's money and their strength with him. He wanted to seize everything for himself, and the two thieves disagreed, so he and his followers fabricated this fabricated story to delude you, O believing slaves, that Antar, the unjust ruler, is a god and has an enemy.
Although Saman, after Antar released him from his prison and expelled him from his palace, was able to form a front with his four friends against Antar, but he was able, in return, to exploit and benefit from the hatred of the people in this area for the tyrannical ruler.
Antar and formed a front against him and gained the trust and respect of the people, even the simple ones among them, to the point that they began to sanctify them and make statues of him and his four companions. But Antar, after he turned into a god and announced the appearance of symptoms of divinity that suddenly appeared on him and faded from his features, was able to win the war between him and the accursed Saman, or the one Antar made accursed by his desire and wished that the believing, naive slaves would be convinced of his divinity and that Saman was fighting him because he wanted evil for them and to harm them and to seduce them to distance them from his mercy, kingdom and greatness and to cause his anger upon them to achieve his revenge on him after he imprisoned him and expelled him from the bliss that he enjoyed when he was his follower in his palace.
With this, Saman turned from a character respected by those who followed him into a cursed villain expelled from the mercy of the god Antar and that he is in a war against the god all the time and will not win it except by luring the believers in Antar the god to his side and front and distancing them from believing in Antar. Isn't this what his deceitful preachers have made you believe?
And pour into your ears and hearings before your minds all the fabricated stories until you reached what we conclude is safe from blind belief that walks without guidance without logic, awareness, or sound understanding of the inner aspects of things and revealing the hidden.. and thus the god Antar turned into a legendary hero fighting the evil Saman who seeks all the time to distance the believers from him and from believing in him out of hatred and spite for him, and even sadness for the loss of the favor and status he enjoyed in his palace. Oh, how poor is this Saman that he has become like a coat rack on which you hang your mistakes and like an old rag with which you wipe your filth. Oh, you fools, idiots, and morons.
Didn't any of you think why Antar claimed that fabricated god, why did he claim that this Saman did not die after he actually died and his followers almost worshipped him? Didn't any of you think, you naive believers, humiliated slaves, why did he invent the story that Saman, after the death of the remaining four companions, comes secretly in disguise and disguised so that no one can see him, and that he pretended to have died and asked the people to say that, then he died, their secret later on, and thus Antar was able to falsely claim that Saman, since he was created from a substance and a nature other than your human nature and that he is from a fiery, thermal substance and not clay, did not die as we humans die?
Didn't any of you ask yourself why he specifically created him from this material? And if that is the case, then how does he say in his alleged story that he asked him to bow, submit, and prostrate to humans, even though he directed his speech and request to his soldiers in his palace, whom he calls his guardian angels (guardians of illusion). Wasn't the speech directed to his angel soldiers and not to a being created from fiery material called (jinn or jinn)? So according to the fabricated story, Saman did not make a mistake in his refusal. Then where are these jinn and where are these angels?
They are just soldiers. Do they turn into other beings at night?!!! There was no evidence on the ground to prove their existence. Then the enlightened researcher sighed a long sigh and said: Your god unfortunately failed even in inventing and falsifying stories because the story must have a plot and persuasion, but I see that this story is completely devoid of any logic and there is no plot or persuasion in it, but rather naivety and stupidity drip from it very clearly. And I ask forgiveness for you, O believing slaves. The only motive that moves you and pushes you to walk in the path of this god or rather this unjust ruler is the fear of his brutality, punishment, injustice and tyranny, even fear and fear only, and without that none of you would care about the matter of his alleged divinity, and he certainly knew that and was certain of that, and he played with all skill, cleverness and evil on the chord of your fear of him and his brutality.
He is an evil, tyrannical ruler, a murderer, a thief who does not have mercy, and he knew how to exploit your fear of him very well. What drives you to obey him is not faith, and what tempts you to worship him or obey him is not your faith in him or Your belief in his divinity, even your fear of him, it was fear and fear alone that was his only way to ensure your loyalty to him. Hasn't any of you slaves ever thought about all his lies?
Or has fear blinded you and greed for his rewards that he tempts you with after an indefinite period in a fairy-tale life made you turn into a creature that resembles a donkey that runs after a carrot and fears the wrath of the stick that splits his skin in half, he said it while smiling bitterly not without sarcasm,,.
And what makes the matter worse and muddier is what I read in your law (the law of An Turabi) which explains and interprets the strange talismans and suspicious lies in your holy book and which tells and narrates with all naivety and impudence how the alleged god Antar was the creator of the Antar universe and the planet (Arut) that we inhabit now through his consulting his soldiers and the guards of his palace whom he calls his guardian angels or the guardian angel where he suggested to them that he would intend to think about creating a human being on our planet, the planet Antaruto, so they predicted with their intelligence and knowledge of the unseen which is supposed according to your god's claim how he will do This creates human beings who shed blood, kill, commit sins and transgressions and disobey His orders while they glorify Him day and night. Aref impatiently: You know that evil is inherent in humans and even other living beings, and that sins and transgressions are part of the makeup of the soul because it is prone to evil, and this is something natural that existed with the beginning of creation, so it is not strange that the angels of the god Antar knew it and deduced it.
The researcher sarcastically: Here the calamity is literally embodied, and this is the basis of the affliction and the crux of the matter is that this is what I mean specifically. The question that arises here is why does God ask his angels? What a strange behavior!!!!
Does he doubt the extent of his sanity or does he not trust his choices!!! If he was a ruler as we know him, I would have said that the matter might seem acceptable, as the ruler consults his subjects, his minister, or his soldiers if necessary, but if he was a god, then he is above all this and that, and he claimed divinity and that he is the creator of this entire universe and the creator of all the beings on our planet, so how can there be doubt in the credibility of his thinking, is he not the All-Knowing, the All-Powerful? And if he is as he described himself with many names and descriptions, more than nine hundred sins, and mentioned them in his holy book, the most important of which is that he is the knower of the unseen, then how can his alleged angels know the unseen while he did not know it yet?!!
Isn't this amazing!!! d how can they predict evil, killing, and bloodshed before humans even exist? And if he is the one who allowed them and put this prediction of the unseen on their tongues, and he knew in advance that they would say that, then why did he ask them in the first place? He is talking to himself in this way from the beginning because he is the one who allowed everything that was said to him!!!! Suppose emptiness and loneliness were killing this arrogant god to the point that he creates beings and tells them and instructs them what to say to him and then discusses with them what he knows in advance that they will say with his knowledge and science! What a contrived discussion!! What logic is there in this foolish, foolish story that only an idiot or an ignorant person would believe?
Even stranger than that is that the angels object to the words of the god as if they were literally proving that he is a foolish or reckless, impulsive god who does not realize the extent of his actions. Not to mention another lapse that I add to the grave lapses that clearly cast aspersions on the depth of this god's being, challenge his divinity, and obliterate the features of his divine, arrogant self from its roots. It is that since the angels or Antar's soldiers are supposed not to know the unseen in advance and did not know at that time what was going on in the mind and heart of the alleged god whom they claim to worship, how did these angels know and predict that? Think carefully about the matter because you will not find a satisfactory answer and you will not be able to explain what happened and how they knew the unseen and your faith will literally collide with only one explanation that will expose this faith and reveal its shame to the public.
The whole story is fabricated from the beginning and this ruler (Antar) invented all these lies or rather they were fabricated for him and his followers, soldiers, assistants and all those with common interests with him fabricated them to increase the simple people and subjects on this planet or this spot that he rules from the planet Antaruto and to increase their fear, terror and threat through this story to increase his tyranny and oppression and then he claims with all simplicity and dullness that he is a just and merciful god and more compassionate and just than a mother to her newborn or infant. What is worse and more serious is that according to what is mentioned in the Holy Book, our planet Antaratu had not yet been created at this time, and there was no doubt that it had no existence or sin to be called by this name because it had not yet existed, according to history, scientific information and research that proved that the age of our planet is 5 or 6 billion years, and this discussion that took place between the Antari god and his angels or guards claims that this happened before the creation of time, meaning many ages before this time, or did this discussion take place between him and his angels since this time, meaning since the creation of the Earth specifically?
Your book left the matter vague and unclear, and this is another major lapse that is added to his many and successive lapses. Then, since he is a god, it was supposed or assumed that these supported angels are nothing more than (robots, meaning machines programmed to obey and praise him, or that they never make mistakes and disobey him, and perhaps for the same reason according to the fabricated story, he may have felt lonely and bored with the fact that his soldiers and angels, as he claims, always obey him and do not… They disobey him and always worship him, so he felt bored and tired and decided to create humans who mix good and evil so that they would disobey him and punish them, so that he would prove that he is a real god, otherwise his existence would be meaningless. But he forgot to explain in his holy book why the angels disobeyed him specifically in this matter? Did he want that for them and planned all of this to happen with his full will? Or did he not know about that? Or maybe he did not have the ability to prevent them from disobeying him!!
If that is the case and this god is able to prevent evil, killing and bloodshed, but he does not want that in order to feel his divinity and power and in order to punish those who disobey him, then he is an evil, narcissistic scopophile who enjoys the pain and torture of others and only thinks of himself and his greatness that he imposes on his creatures in order to feel his importance and divinity. So he is sick with narcissism. If this god does not want evil and killing from those he claims are his creatures, but he is not able and cannot prevent evil, then he is not omnipotent and is not able and not strong as he claims. Therefore he is not able. He is either evil and leaves evil in the world by his desire and will, or he is weak and helpless and cannot prevent evil and has no choice but to punish only those who commit it. Therefore, in both cases he is not a god at all, but rather a false claimant and his character as a god is a fictitious character and a myth that does not exist at all. The question here is why your god Antar al-Antari, when he decided and was kind and compassionate towards us, the sons of mankind, and thought of creating the first human being, the one who caused the strife between him and the accursed Saman, why did he create him from clay? And why clay in the first place?!!