While Louis was busy forging a political leash for his rampaging general in Italy, a far more delicate and dangerous game was beginning in Paris. The Austrian court, the ancient and powerful House of Habsburg, was in a state of quiet, dignified panic. Napoleon's lightning campaign had done more than just defeat their armies in Italy; it had shattered their entire conception of warfare. Their veteran generals, men who had fought wars according to the stately, predictable rules of the 18th century, were utterly bewildered by this new form of war—a war of speed, of relentless attack, of a seemingly inexhaustible revolutionary fervor. They feared, with good reason, that if Bonaparte were to break out of the Po Valley and march on Vienna itself, they would have no way to stop him.
They wanted peace. And they were willing to pay a very high price for it.
A secret envoy was dispatched from Vienna. This was not a formal diplomatic mission. It was a ghost, a whisper. The man chosen for the task was not a high-ranking diplomat, but a shrewd, discreet Belgian banker named de Proli, a man with connections in both Vienna and Paris. He traveled under a false name, disguised as a Swiss watch merchant, his mission so secret that not even the Austrian ambassador in Paris was aware of it.
But nothing so significant could escape the web of intelligence that Talleyrand had woven across the continent. The King's Minister of Secrets, alerted by his agents in Geneva of the banker's unusual travel plans, had his men intercept de Proli the moment he arrived in Paris. He was not arrested. He was politely but firmly "invited" to a clandestine meeting.
The meeting took place in a private, heavily curtained room in Talleyrand's own residence, the Hôtel de Galliffet. The Austrian envoy, his disguise now useless, found himself facing not just Talleyrand, but the King of France himself.
Louis had decided to handle this negotiation personally. After a few tense pleasantries, he came straight to the point. "Monsieur de Proli," he said, his voice calm and direct. "I am a busy man. Let us dispense with the theater. You have come from Vienna, from Baron von Thugut. You have an offer for me. Let us hear it."
The Austrian envoy, a man accustomed to the slow, intricate dance of traditional diplomacy, was taken aback by this bluntness. He took a deep breath and laid out the terms. The offer was stunning, a complete capitulation that went far beyond Louis's most optimistic strategic goals.
First, Austria would formally and permanently cede the Austrian Netherlands—the rich, populous territory that corresponded to modern-day Belgium—to France. This would achieve the "natural frontiers" of France at the Rhine, a strategic dream that had obsessed and eluded French kings for centuries.
Second, the Habsburg Emperor would formally recognize the French Republic, its new constitutional government, and the legitimacy of Louis XVI as "King of the French." This would end France's diplomatic isolation and shatter the coalition of monarchs arrayed against it.
Third, Austria would pay a massive indemnity of fifty million livres in gold, to be delivered within six months, as compensation for the costs of the war.
It was a complete and total victory, everything France could possibly have hoped to gain from the war, and it was being offered on a silver platter, without another drop of French blood needing to be shed.
Louis listened, his face an unreadable mask, but his mind was racing. This was it. This was the endgame. The ultimate triumph that would secure his dynasty, stabilize his country, and make France the undisputed master of the continent.
But he knew there had to be a catch. There always was. "And in return for this… generosity?" he asked, his voice laced with a subtle irony.
The envoy hesitated. "His Imperial Majesty believes in the concert of Europe, in the balance of power," he began, resorting to diplomatic platitudes.
"Spare me," Louis said, his voice turning to ice. "What is your price?"
De Proli swallowed. "His Majesty's government believes that, for the sake of stability, such a significant transfer of territory must be… balanced. As compensation for the loss of his Belgian provinces, the Emperor requires a free hand to… rationalize his interests in Italy."
He then laid out the price. It was as terrible as the offer was tempting. In exchange for ceding Belgium to France, Austria demanded a free hand to conquer and absorb the territories of the ancient, neutral, and defenseless Republic of Venice. They would carve it up, taking its rich mainland territories of Venetia and Istria for themselves. The city of Venice itself would be left a hollowed-out, powerless husk.
Louis was faced with an agonizing, world-defining choice. The room was silent as his mind grappled with the two paths that lay before him.
The first was the path of pragmatic reason, the path of Realpolitik. It was the path advocated by the silent, knowing look in Talleyrand's eyes. To accept the deal was a geopolitical masterstroke. It would be hailed as the greatest French triumph in a hundred years. It secured the nation's borders, ended a costly war, brought a fortune in gold into the treasury, and solidified his regime beyond any challenge. The fate of Venice, a corrupt and decadent oligarchy long past its prime, was a small, regrettable price to pay. As Talleyrand would have said, "A king's first and only duty is to the interests of his own people, not to the sentimental idea of other people's liberty."
The second path was the one of ideology, the path that Antoine Barnave, had he been in the room, would have championed. The French Revolution was supposed to be a crusade for liberty, a beacon of hope for the oppressed peoples of Europe, not just another old-fashioned war of conquest and cynical partition. To participate in the destruction of a sister republic, however flawed, would be a monstrous betrayal of their own founding principles. It would prove Robespierre's most bitter accusations right: that this new government was no better than the rapacious kings it had replaced. It would be an act of profound moral hypocrisy.
His HUD, a silent observer to this moral crisis, flashed with the long-term consequences, presenting the choice not as one of good versus evil, but as a cold calculation of risk and reward.
DIPLOMATIC OFFER: THE AUSTRIAN PARTITION PROPOSAL
OPTION A: Accept the Partition of Venice.
Short-Term National Stability: +80% (HIGH)
Geopolitical Position: DOMINANT
Financial Impact: MASSIVE INFLUX OF CAPITAL
Ideological Credibility (International): CRITICAL FAILURE (-90%)
Long-Term Risk: Establishes France as an aggressive, untrustworthy, and imperialistic power, sowing the seeds for future coalitions against it.
OPTION B: Refuse the Partition of Venice.
Short-Term National Stability: LOW (War continues indefinitely)
Financial Strain: HIGH (Risk of debt crisis returns)
Ideological Credibility (International): STRONG
Long-Term Risk: A prolonged, bloody, and expensive war with an uncertain outcome against a determined enemy.
Louis was torn. His 21st-century mind, the mind of Arthur Miller, knew that this kind of cynical horse-trading was how the world actually worked. Nations had interests, not friends. To refuse such a deal was, from a purely strategic perspective, insane.
But the King he had become, the man who had sworn a solemn oath on the Champ de Mars to a constitution founded on the Declaration of the Rights of Man, was viscerally repulsed by the idea. He had not fought so hard, risked so much, just to become another predator in the European jungle. He had wanted to build something different, something better.
He looked from the impassive face of the Austrian envoy to the cool, expectant gaze of Talleyrand. The Austrian was waiting for his answer. His choice, he knew, would do more than just end a war. It would define the moral character of his new France for a generation. Would it be a beacon of liberty, or just another predatory empire with a new, more virtuous-sounding name?
To be the first to know about future sequels and new projects, google my official author blog: Waystar Novels.