But those in the know understand that receiving funding and being influenced are not the same thing.
If it weren't the case, why haven't citizens seen any satire about Sir Arthur once getting shot at under the Tower of London in recent years?
I know that some might say it's normal for mainstream newspapers, which focus on timely reporting, to be influenced, but do those tabloids that rely on sensationalism to boost sales really yield to Arthur Hastings?
Underground tabloids certainly don't yield to him, or rather, those untaxed illegal publications disregard anyone.
Precisely for this reason, partnering with the Treasury to combat tax evasion in the publishing industry has been a routine task for Scotland Yard.
In dealing with unfavorable public opinion about Sir Arthur, the England Electromagnetic Telegraph Company tackles the symptoms, Scotland Yard tackles the root cause; with both methods combined in one course, can the effect not be good?
