One category consists of three projects that have already been approved. The issue here is that the approval only bears the signature of the legal representative. According to City Development Company's opinion, the approval process must have multiple leaders' signatures and be passed by the board of directors.
Additionally, the official seal of City Development Company was not affixed.
So, this approval itself is incomplete.
Furthermore, the meeting minutes from the Investment and Development Department did not receive company consent; the court ruling also stated that City Development Company did not recognize this allocation plan.
Therefore, the court determined that for the three projects with the legal representative's signature, Su Yeping's claim to fifty percent of the Investment and Development Department's bonus lacked sufficient evidence and was not supported.
